Perak Oh Perak

Salam semua

Memang lately ni hangat berita tentang pertukaran kerajaan di Perak.

Persoalannya siapa salah?

Adakah BN salah?

Adakah PR salah?

Adakah ADUN yg salah atau mengambil kesempatan?

Adakah Sultan salah?

Atau adakah sistem yang salah?

Penyokong BN akan katakan "Strategi Lompat Parti" ni PR yang mulakan dan dah makan tuan. Penyokong PR pula katakan BN biadap kerana merampas kuasa tanpa menunggu usul undi tak percaya di Dewan Rakyat terlebih dahulu. Ada pula kata Sultan berpihak pada BN dan tidak berlaku adil pada rakyat yang mengundi. Ada pula yang kata kerana duit dan habuan yang yang menjadi punca ADUN2 berpaling tadah. Yelah nak harapkan elaun RM5000 sebulan dgn durin runtuh berjuta ringgit, macam langit dgn bumi bezanya. Andaikata iman dan Allah yang dijadikan pemimpin, nescaya, peristiwa lompat parti tak berlaku, amanah rakyat yg dijunjung. Dan ada macam2 lagi andaian dan teori yg menjadi bualan di kedai2 kopi, ofis dan di mana-mana saja.

Macamanapun, tak ramai yang sedar bahawa inilah kelemahan sistem demokrasi ciptaan manusia yang dimodifikasi lagi menjadi demokrasi ala-Malaysia. Ada demokrasi ala-Amerika, ada demokrasi ala-India, ada demokrasi ala-Turki, ada demokrasi ala-British dan macam2 lagi. Pendek kata fundamentalnya masih tetap sistem demokrasi yang berdasarkan pemikiran Plato dengan temanya yang terkenal iaitu "From the People To the People and For the People".

Manusia mencipta undang-undang berdasarkan logik akal dan fikiran semasa tanpa melihat dgn lebih jauh dan teliti. Sedangkan undang2 yg sempurna sudah pastilah datang dari Pencipta manusia dan alam ini sendiri iaitu Allah swt. Malangnya, undang2 Allah hanya tinggal di naskhah2 Al Quran dan Hadis Rasulullah saw.

Peristiwa di Perak adalah satu teladan dan bukti bahawa tidak adilnya sistem perundangan demokrasi Malaysia. Wakil2 rakyat yg diberi mandat oleh rakyat dan dipilih berdasarkan parti yg diwakilinya, bila2 masa boleh khianat meninggalkan parti masing2 samada untuk menjadi wakil bebas atau menyertai parti lawan. Sultan dan Raja pula dengan kuasa yg mutlak yg seolah-olah tak boleh dicabar langsung, bebas membuat keputusan tanpa perlu berfikir dgn teliti tentang maslahat dan kepentingan rakyat.

Rakyat yg menegur atau membantah akan dikatakan derhaka. Maksum kah para sultan dan raja kita? Adakah mereka ini maksum seperti Rasul2 dan para Nabi? Memang ada rakyat yg biadap dalam menunjuk protes kepada Sultan. Kalaupun membantah, adab mesti dijaga, adab muslim yg diajar Rasulullah saw haruslah di teladani, bukannya baring di tengah jalan. Cuba kita ingat semula akhlak para Khulafa Ar Rasyidin seperti Abu Bakar, Umar, Usman dan Ali yg sentiasa bersikap terbuka dalam menerima teguran dan bantahan rakyat. Hatta Rasulullah saw seorang yang maksum pun bersikap terbuka dan sentiasa bersedia menerima teguran sahabat , juga cemuhan dan kejian musuh2 Baginda.

Jika ada perbuatan yg salah oleh para raja kita, moga para mufti dan kadi dapat menegur seadanya menurut kehendak Allah. Para Raja juga manusia biasa, bukan malaikat atau nabi. Andaikata ada mufti atau tokoh agama diherdik, dimarah atau ditampar maka bersabarlah dan berdoalah agar dibukakan pintu hati para raja kita. Insya Allah, Allah sentiasa bersama mereka yg bersabar.Moga Allah limpahkan kurnia dan rahmatNya kepada para raja dan sultan kita.

Moga diberikan mereka ini taufiq dan hidayah agar memerintah dgn adil sesuai dgn mandat yang diberikan sebagai Ketua Agama Islam setiap negeri . Mandat yang diberikan rakyat tak sepertinya mendapat mandat dari Allah maka mudah-mudahan , para raja kita juga mendapat mandat dari Ilahi. Patik insan pacal yang hina mohon ampun tuanku, patik berdoa agar hidup Tuanku dimuliakan Allah. Wallahu 'alam bissawab.

Selamatkan Palestin! Jihad Fi Sabilillah

Salam

Alangkah hibanya andaikata hati kita tidak bergolak dgn apa yg berlaku di Palestin . Alangkah mewah dan mudahnya utk kita makan di sini hingga pembaziran pun tak rasa apa-apa sedangkan ada anak2 kecil di Palestin yg tak makan sehingga 5 hari.....mengikat perut dgn kain dan batu, mengenangkan kembali kita pada kizah Rasulullah saw dan para sahabat yg diboikot oleh kaum musyrikin di Mekah dahulu.

Susah agaknya utk kita tinggalkan burger McDonald, kopi Starbucks, ayam KFC, Milo (Nestle) sebab nikmatnya makanan2 ini utk kita sedangkan mereka di Palestin nak merasai nikmat air seteguk pun amat payah. Jadi apakah yg boleh kita lakukan? Marilah kita JIHAD FISABILILLAH !!!

Kita tak mampu nak angkat senjata, kita tak mampu utk berperang jadi marilah kita usaha berdoa setiap kali lepas solat lima waktu, solat hajat berdoa utk diberikan kekuatan kepada para mujahidin di Palestin, diberikan kesabaran kepada saudara2 Islam kita di Palestin.

Marilah kita keluarkan wang sebanyak mana yg kita mampu utk pengorbanan dan bantuan kemanusiaan kepada mereka. Pengorbanan walaupun hanya meninggalkan " 1 burger McDonald" membawa erti yg amat besar kepada saudara muslimin kita di Palestin.

Sesungguhnya hanya LAKNAT ALLAH yang paling layak untuk para Yahudi kafirin. Semoga Allah menghantar tentera Ahzab ke bumi Palestin. Amiin ya Robbanal 'alamiin.

"Orang-orang kafir Yahudi dari Bani Israil telah dilaknat melalui lisan Nabi Daud dan Nabi Isa ibni Maryam. Yang demikian itu disebabkan mereka MENDERHAKA dan selalu MENCEROBOH" (Al Maidah :78)

Telah Allah nyatakan dlm Al Quran tentang perangai kaum Yahudi kafir yg suka menderhaka dan menceroboh hak orang lain. Mereka ini memang telah disumpah oleh Nabi Daud dan Nabi Isa semenjak dahulu lagi.

"Maka (Kami laknatkan mereka), disebabkan mereka melanggar perjanjian setia mereka, dan mereka kufur ingkar terhadap ayat-ayat keterangan Allah dan mereka membunuh nabi-nabi tanpa (alasan) yang benar dan mengatakan: "Hati kami tertutup." Bahkan, sebenarnya Allah telah mengunci mati hati mereka karena kekafirannya, karena itu mereka tidak beriman kecuali sebahagian kecil dari mereka." (An Nisaa : 155)

Akibat perbuatan laknat mereka yg suka melanggar perjanjian dan membunuh ramai nabi dan rasul, maka Allah telah kunci hati mereka kecuali sedikit drp mereka yg diberikan hidayah utk beriman. Jadi, marilah kita jihad fi sabilillah untuk menentang Yahudi laknatullah berdasarkan kemampuan masing-masing.

Wassalam

Why are most of the Muslims fundamentalists and terrorists?

Salam. Artikel from Dr Zakir Naik. Jazakallah to him.

Why are most of the Muslims fundamentalists and terrorists?

"MUSLIMS ARE FUNDAMENTALISTS AND TERRORISTS"

This question is often hurled at Muslims, either directly or indirectly, during any discussion on religion or world affairs. Muslim stereotypes are perpetuated in every form of the media accompanied by gross misinformation about Islam and Muslims. In fact, such misinformation and false propaganda often leads to discrimination and acts of violence against Muslims. A case in point is the anti-Muslim campaign in the American media following the Oklahoma bomb blast, where the press was quick to declare a 'Middle Eastern conspiracy' behind the attack. The culprit was later identified as a soldier from the American Armed Forces.

Let us analyze this allegation of 'fundamentalism' and 'terrorism':

1. Definition of the word 'fundamentalist'

A fundamentalist is a person who follows and adheres to the fundamentals of the doctrine or theory he is following. For a person to be a good doctor, he should know, follow, and practise the fundamentals of medicine. In other words, he should be a fundamentalist in the field of medicine. For a person to be a good mathematician, he should know, follow and practise the fundamentals of mathematics. He should be a fundamentalist in the field of mathematics. For a person to be a good scientist, he should know, follow and practise the fundamentals of science. He should be a fundamentalist in the field of science.

2. Not all 'fundamentalists' are the same

One cannot paint all fundamentalists with the same brush. One cannot categorize all fundamentalists as either good or bad. Such a categorization of any fundamentalist will depend upon the field or activity in which he is a fundamentalist. A fundamentalist robber or thief causes harm to society and is therefore undesirable. A fundamentalist doctor, on the other hand, benefits society and earns much respect.

3. I am proud to be a Muslim fundamentalist

I am a fundamentalist Muslim who, by the grace of Allah, knows, follows and strives to practise the fundamentals of Islam. A true Muslim does not shy away from being a fundamentalist. I am proud to be a fundamentalist Muslim because, I know that the fundamentals of Islam are beneficial to humanity and the whole world. There is not a single fundamental of Islam that causes harm or is against the interests of the human race as a whole. Many people harbour misconceptions about Islam and consider several teachings of Islam to be unfair or improper. This is due to insufficient and incorrect knowledge of Islam. If one critically analyzes the teachings of Islam with an open mind, one cannot escape the fact that Islam is full of benefits both at the individual and collective levels.

4. Dictionary meaning of the word 'fundamentalist'

According to Webster's dictionary 'fundamentalism' was a movement in American Protestanism that arose in the earlier part of the 20th century. It was a reaction to modernism, and stressed the infallibility of the Bible, not only in matters of faith and morals but also as a literal historical record. It stressed on belief in the Bible as the literal word of God. Thus fundamentalism was a word initially used for a group of Christians who believed that the Bible was the verbatim word of God without any errors and mistakes.

According to the Oxford dictionary 'fundamentalism' means 'strict maintenance of ancient or fundamental doctrines of any religion, especially Islam'.

Today the moment a person uses the word fundamentalist he thinks of a Muslim who is a terrorist.

5. Every Muslim should be a terrorist

Every Muslim should be a terrorist. A terrorist is a person who causes terror. The moment a robber sees a policeman he is terrified. A policeman is a terrorist for the robber. Similarly every Muslim should be a terrorist for the antisocial elements of society, such as thieves, dacoits and rapists. Whenever such an anti-social element sees a Muslim, he should be terrified. It is true that the word 'terrorist' is generally used for a person who causes terror among the common people. But a true Muslim should only be a terrorist to selective people i.e. anti-social elements, and not to the common innocent people. In fact a Muslim should be a source of peace for innocent people.

6. Different labels given to the same individual for the same action, i.e. 'terrorist' and 'patriot'

Before India achieved independence from British rule, some freedom fighters of India who did not subscribe to non-violence were labeled as terrorists by the British government. The same individuals have been lauded by Indians for the same activities and hailed as 'patriots'. Thus two different labels have been given to the same people for the same set of actions. One is calling him a terrorist while the other is calling him a patriot. Those who believed that Britain had a right to rule over India called these people terrorists, while those who were of the view that Britain had no right to rule India called them patriots and freedom fighters.

It is therefore important that before a person is judged, he is given a fair hearing. Both sides of the argument should be heard, the situation should be analyzed, and the reason and the intention of the person should be taken into account, and then the person can be judged accordingly.

7. Islam means peace

Islam is derived from the word 'salaam' which means peace. It is a religion of peace whose fundamentals teach its followers to maintain and promote peace throughout the world.

Thus every Muslim should be a fundamentalist i.e. he should follow the fundamentals of the Religion of Peace: Islam. He should be a terrorist only towards the antisocial elements in order to promote peace and justice in the society.